David Ly is the founder of Iveda, having served as CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors since the company’s inception in 2003.
In the era of rapid technological advancement, the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and surveillance has become a topic of both fascination and concern. The popular portrayal of AI in surveillance, often influenced by Hollywood, tends to veer toward a dystopian future where omnipotent AI systems invade our privacy and predict crimes with uncanny accuracy. However, the reality is more nuanced, less alarming and certainly less fantastical.
AI, when applied to surveillance, is primarily a tool for data analysis and pattern recognition. It serves as a force multiplier for human efforts in monitoring and can bring significant benefits to the enhancement of security and overall efficiency. It excels at processing vast amounts of data in real time, allowing it to identify unusual patterns or behaviors that might otherwise go unnoticed by humans. This has proven invaluable in fields like law enforcement and public safety.
One of the most prominent misconceptions about AI in surveillance is its ability to predict crimes with certainty. AI can only provide insights based on historical data and patterns; unlike the Precogs in Minority Report, AI is incapable of foreseeing criminal activities before they occur. Rather, it assists law enforcement agencies in identifying areas with higher crime probabilities, optimizing resource allocation and radically improving response times. Predictive policing, for instance, relies on AI in this capacity, but it doesn’t possess a crystal ball into the future.
Privacy concerns are often at the forefront of discussions around AI-powered surveillance. That said, the fear that AI systems are constantly breaching our privacy is, to a certain extent, relatively unfounded. AI systems are designed to comply with specific data protection and privacy regulations. In fact, many countries around the globe already adhere to strict laws and guidelines governing the use of surveillance technology, such as:
• The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which came into effect for the EU in 2018, includes provisions on the use of surveillance cameras and mandates that the processing of personal data must comply with data protection principles, requiring organizations to provide clear information about the purpose and use of surveillance.
• The Privacy Act in Australia passed back in 1988 regulates the handling of personal information––mandating organizations to have privacy policies and to handle personal data responsibly.
• China has also implemented strict regulations on the use of surveillance technology, especially in the context of the country’s social credit system. These regulations govern the collection, storage and use of personal data and, in many cases, require consent.
While specific regulations and guidelines may vary from one jurisdiction to another, the common goal is to ensure that surveillance is conducted in a manner that respects fundamental human rights and adheres to ethical standards, protecting individual privacy and data rights. Privacy is a fundamental right, and most governments and organizations recognize the importance of striking a balance between security and civil liberties.
Nonetheless, ethical questions remain. The use of facial recognition technology, for example, has sparked heated debates, with critics arguing that it can be invasive and prone to bias, leading to potential misuse by authorities. Due to legitimate concerns about the exploitation of surveillance data, data breaches and the risk of creating a surveillance state––where an individual’s every move can be tracked––striking the right balance between utilizing AI for security while safeguarding individual rights remains a challenge.
Here are five tips––for police enforcement, government officials, or anyone else charged with manning AI surveillance systems––to achieve this critical harmony.
Transparency And Accountability: Ensuring transparency in the use of AI surveillance systems is crucial. The purpose and scope of surveillance must be clearly communicated to the public. Further, establishing clear accountability mechanisms can aid in the necessary oversight and potential recourse if surveillance data is misused. This could involve independent audits or regulatory bodies.
Privacy By Design: It’s important to implement privacy-enhancing technologies and practices from the beginning of system development; privacy should never be an afterthought. Consider anonymizing and encrypting data to protect the identities of individuals captured in surveillance footage and only collect and retain data necessary for the stated purpose.
Consent And Data Minimization: Always work to obtain informed consent when possible. In scenarios where consent is not feasible (e.g., public spaces), implementing data retention policies––that specify how long surveillance data will be stored and when it will be deleted––can aid in these efforts.
Bias Mitigation: Continuously monitoring and addressing biases in AI algorithms––especially in facial recognition technology––is essential to minimizing bias within the systems being deployed. Algorithms should be updated regularly to reduce disparities in the treatment of different demographic groups; diverse representation in the data used to train AI systems can also help to prevent algorithmic bias.
Legal And Ethical Compliance: Familiarize yourself with and adhere to relevant laws and regulations concerning surveillance and data privacy in your jurisdiction. Establish clear ethical guidelines for the use of AI in surveillance and train personnel to adhere to these principles.
The ethical questions surrounding AI-powered surveillance are real and should not be underestimated. Striking the right balance between utilizing AI for security and protecting the rights of individuals being surveilled remains an ongoing challenge. It’s imperative that we have transparent regulations, rigorous oversight and ongoing discussions to ensure that AI surveillance serves as a force for good without infringing on our fundamental rights and freedoms.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Read the full article here