Chief Executive Officer at Coastline Equity, serving investors in the Southern California market with property management services.
“As goes California, so goes the country.” This adage is particularly relevant when discussing the Justice for Renters Initiative, which has qualified for the 2024 California ballot and I believe could set a precedent for housing policy across the U.S. The act aims to remove the statewide rent control ban, thus allowing local governments the autonomy to stabilize rents.
What could this mean for landlords and professionals in the broader real estate market?
The History Of Rent Control In California
Rent control in California has a storied and complex history that serves as a microcosm for the broader national debate on housing policy. The Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act of 1995 currently serves as the cornerstone of rent control policies in the state. This legislation was enacted to balance the interests of landlords and tenants by allowing property owners to set rental prices for new tenants while limiting the extent to which rents could be increased for existing tenants. Costa-Hawkins exempted single-family homes, condominiums and any housing built after 1995 from rent control.
Before Costa-Hawkins, local jurisdictions had more freedom to enact rent control measures. While rent control can benefit tenants by preventing rents from rising too quickly, these measures have also been found to have unintended consequences, such as declines in the quality of existing rental units over time. The enactment of Costa-Hawkins was seen as a compromise to mitigate these issues. By allowing rents to reset to market rates when a tenant moved out, the act aimed to incentivize landlords to invest in their properties while still offering some protections to tenants against arbitrary rent hikes.
However, the real estate landscape has changed since the mid-90s. Skyrocketing rents have reignited the debate over rent control. Some tenant advocacy groups suggest Costa-Hawkins has contributed to the housing affordability crisis by allowing landlords to charge exorbitant rents for new leases, thereby driving up the overall cost of housing. This sets the stage for the Justice for Renters Initiative.
The Justice For Renters Initiative
The Justice for Renters Act proposes to eliminate the California statewide ban on rent control, empowering local governments to enact laws that could stabilize rents and prevent them from skyrocketing year after year. Additionally, the act aims to tackle one of the root causes of homelessness—unaffordable housing—by making it more accessible.
Proponents of the act believe it is a much-needed reform to make neighborhoods more affordable for low- and middle-income renters. They believe that the act will put an end to high rents that have displaced tenants and led to increased homelessness. Various groups, including the AIDS Healthcare Foundation in Los Angeles, the California Nurses Association and the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, among others, have thrown their weight behind the initiative, according to the San Diego Union-Tribune.
The act has critics as well. The California Apartment Association, for example, called it an “attack” on the Costa-Hawkins Act. I’ve also seen some share concerns that the act could discourage the construction of new housing units, incentivize landlords to remove existing ones from the rental market and reduce the supply of available rental properties, thereby exacerbating California’s housing shortage.
The Potential Impact On Real Estate Professionals
For landlords and property owners, the act could introduce new regulations, which some might feel make property management more complex. In turn, I can envision this deterring some individual investors and small-scale property owners from entering the market or continuing to operate, which could impact housing stock and potentially lead to properties being acquired by large investment entities. From my perspective, this could alter the real estate landscape in California and set a precedent for other states to follow, thereby affecting the national market.
This is why I believe professionals in the real estate market should engage in productive and open conversations. Educate yourself, and consult with experts in the field to understand the full scope of how a policy like this could potentially affect the real estate market in your area.
When facing potential regulatory changes, real estate professionals can also consider using technology solutions that simplify compliance. Leveraging property technology software with regulatory tracking capabilities might be a game-changer for some and help housing providers stay ahead of the curve.
Landlords should also inform tenants about how potential policy changes could affect them. This approach not only builds trust but also prepares both parties for any adjustments they might need to make. Staying informed, embracing technology to streamline operations and maintaining open lines of communication will be key strategies for navigating the real estate landscape.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Read the full article here